🔗 Share this article

Opponents have charged the German head of government, Friedrich Merz, of adopting what is described as “harmful” rhetoric on migration, following he supported “very large scale” deportations of persons from cities – and claimed that parents of girls would endorse his viewpoint.

Firm Response

Friedrich Merz, who took office in May vowing to counter the growth of the extremist AfD party, recently reprimanded a reporter who inquired whether he wanted to revise his hardline comments on migration from last week considering broad criticism, or express regret for them.

“It is unclear if you have children, and daughters among them,” stated to the correspondent. “Speak with your female children, I believe you’ll get a very direct response. There is nothing to withdraw; in fact I reiterate: it is necessary to alter the situation.”

Political Reaction

The left-leaning opposition accused Merz of borrowing tactics from extremist parties, whose allegations that women and girls are being victimized by foreigners with sexual violence has become a worldwide extremist slogan.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, charged that Merz of having a patronising message for young women that ignored their actual societal issues.

“Perhaps ‘the daughters’ are also displeased with Merz only caring about their rights and safety when he can leverage them to support his completely outdated approaches?” she wrote on social media.

Protection Priority

Merz said his main focus was “protection in public space” and stressed that only when it could be ensured “will the established parties regain confidence”.

He faced criticism last week for comments that opponents claimed suggested that diversity itself was a challenge in Germany’s urban centers: “Naturally we still have this challenge in the city environment, and for this reason the home affairs minister is now endeavoring to allow and implement deportations on a very large scale,” Merz said during a tour to Brandenburg state outside Berlin.

Discrimination Allegations

The leader of the Greens in Brandenburg charged the chancellor of inciting ethnic bias with his comment, which provoked minor demonstrations in several urban centers at the weekend.

“It’s dangerous when incumbent parties attempt to characterize people as a difficulty due to their looks or heritage,” remarked.

Natalie Pawlik of the Social Democrats, coalition partners in Merz’s government, said: “Immigration must not be labeled negatively with reductive or populist kneejerk reactions – this fragments society more deeply and eventually assists the wrong people rather than promoting resolutions.”

Electoral Background

The chancellor’s political alliance achieved a unsatisfactory 28.5 percent performance in the February general election compared to the anti-foreigner, anti-Islam AfD with its record 20.8 percent.

Afterwards, the far right party has matched with the CDU/CSU, even overtaking it in various opinion polls, amid public concerns around immigration, criminal activity and economic slowdown.

Historical Context

The chancellor ascended to leadership of his political group vowing a tougher line on immigration than the longtime CDU chancellor the former head of government, rejecting her the optimistic motto from the asylum seeker situation a previous decade and attributing to her part of the blame for the AfD’s strength.

He has encouraged an at times more populist tone than his predecessor, notoriously blaming “small pashas” for frequent vandalism on New Year’s Eve and refugees for occupying oral health consultations at the cost of German citizens.

Political Strategy

Merz’s Christian Democrats met on Sunday and Monday to hash out a plan ahead of several local polls during the upcoming year. The AfD holds substantial margins in several eastern states, flirting with a record 40% support.

Friedrich Merz affirmed that his political group was aligned in preventing cooperation in administration with the AfD, a approach typically called as the “barrier”.

Party Concerns

Nevertheless, the latest survey results has spooked certain CDU members, causing a few of party officials and advisers to suggest in recent weeks that the policy could be untenable and counterproductive in the long run.

Those disagreeing argue that as long as the 12-year-old AfD, which domestic security authorities have designated as radical, is able to snipe from the sidelines without having to implement the hard choices governing requires, it will gain from the incumbent deficit affecting many developed countries.

Research Findings

Researchers in Germany have discovered that conventional organizations such as the CDU were gradually enabling the extremist to determine priorities, inadvertently normalizing their concepts and circulating them further.

Even though Merz resisted using the word “barrier” on the recent occasion, he maintained there were “basic distinctions” with the Alternative für Deutschland which would make collaboration impossible.

“We acknowledge this difficulty,” he stated. “Going forward also demonstrate clearly and very explicit what the AfD stands for. We will distance ourselves explicitly and very explicitly from them. {Above all